Categorie
Browse History
|
Processing Scenario |
Traditional Manual Calibration Method |
Laser Collimation Coaxial Instrument |
|
Calibration Accuracy |
≥0.3mm |
≤0.08mm |
|
Calibration Efficiency |
Low, relying on experience, requiring multiple dotting, observation, and debugging on the strip, time - consuming |
High, 3 steps to complete the whole - process calibration, and it can be completed in more than 1 minute |
|
Yield Performance |
The success rate of coaxiality is only about 85% |
The success rate of coaxiality is 100% |
|
Operation Difficulty |
High, requiring high experience for debugging personnel |
Low, the whole process is visualized, and newbies can get started quickly |
|
Safety |
There is a laser safety risk. Laser is emitted during debugging, which may damage eyes |
No laser safety risk, no laser emission required during debugging |
|
Equipment Adaptability |
Poor, the equipment is heavy and complex, and it is difficult to flexibly adapt to multiple devices |
Good, portable design, can flexibly adapt to multiple devices |
|
Intelligent Degree |
Low, lack of self - diagnosis system |
AI |
